Is this proof that when it comes to national security neo-cons are about as bad as it gets?

Republicans and or conservatives have the worst record for our national defense . Nixon CUTS and RUNS from Vietnam. Iran blackmails Reagan with hostages (Carter got tough and sent in special forces until chopper was shot down) so Reagan arms Iran and the Contras.



Reagan CUTS and RUNS from Hezbollah in Lebanon when they bomb a marines barracks. Reagan and Bush arm, train, finance Bin Laden and his boys in Afghanistan (the CIA operative who was the go between said on p.b.s that he warned Reagan and Bush to stop dealing with Bin Laden, but they ignored him thus ending any excuse of “we were helping him to destroy the Russian occupation”. http://www.consortiumnews.com/Print/0917…



Reagan, Bush, Rumsfeld give Saddam chemical weapons. Hundreds of thousands die during this long ordeal (including an estimated 90,000 infants and toddlers which is more in that time span then abortions for a decade) Saddam runs out and then we stop arming him. That’s why we knew there were no WMD’s in Iraq.



Reagan, Bush arm and finance the Taliban. Bush’s go into business with the Bin Ladens (Carlyle Group). Bush’s become great friends with the Saudi Royal family, the same family which has financed terrorism for years. Dubya ignores Presidential Daily Brief which says “Bin Laden determined to strike U.S.”. George Tenant Begs Bush to be on alert for airplane hijackings from Arab students who are being trained to fly aircraft, but not how to take off or land. Congress wants a budget of 3 million to combat terrorism, Bush squashes this and gives zero, that’s zero dollars to terrorism. Richard Clark constantly warns Bush about terrorist attacks that will be coming soon, Bush ignores him. 9/11/01 We are hit on Bush’s watch and Bush looks like an idiot on TV when he finds out we are under attack, and operation blame Clinton because Bush is an idiot begins.



Bush protects the Bin Laden family before 9/11 when the FBI was told to back off Bin Ladens brother who was funneling money to Al-Qaeda http://www1.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/… 9/11. Bush tries handing over port security to countries linked to terrorism. Bush cuts a deal with Pakistan, a country to be well known to be a safe haven for terrorism. Now Pakistan has cut a deal with Al-Qaeda.



Bush tries handing over our ports to countries linked to terrorism. Bush is opening up our borders to Mexico and Canada soon allowing terrorists free reign in America, and handing over a hundred thousand jobs to Mexicans to be in charge of our cargo security, and all importing and exporting (this one is from Conservative Republicans http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?i… )



People start making excuses “we haven’t been attacked in five years. Experts then ask “what about five years and one month, this shuts up Republicans.



Americans invent a new drinking game called “if in doubt blame Clinton”. Whenever a nut case Republican or conservative tries to put blame on Clinton to divert attention away from the Republicans terror record (see above, or read your high school history books) take one shot of whiskey.



Rumsfeld sells nuclear reactors to N. Korea. Bush sells parts for fighter jets to Iran. The question is do you still feel safe? And will Republican conservatives quit arming, training, financing all our enemies?Is this proof that when it comes to national security neo-cons are about as bad as it gets?
Where on Earth did you go to school to learn history? Even in bad shape as our education system is, there is no way you could get that many facts screwed up!



1. Regan was never blackmailed by Iran with the hostages. They were taken hostage under the leadership of President Carter, and released the day Regan took office!



2. Carter didn't send in special forces, nor did the Iranians shoot down a chopper! God Lord, where do you get this stuff? A chopper hit another aircraft on the ground attempting to land, setting off numerous explosions.



3. President Bush NEVER sold fighter jet parts to Iran! This practice stopped in the late 70's due to the unstable govt there!



4. No WMD's in Iraq? Look into the New York Times archive, April 2001. Even this Democrat newspaper had proof that the WMDs were there.

You are just another Kool-Aid drinking, tin foil hat wearing, ';hate America'; left-wing Liberal nut. None of your facts are right, even with the so called sources you provide....commentaries don't count as sources of facts! And BTW, the first source you list (consortium-news), it says that the world trade towers WERE INDEED brought down with aircraft flying into them! So whats happened to the ';It was an inside job'; theories you Libs love to spout off? Can't have your sources both ways now!Is this proof that when it comes to national security neo-cons are about as bad as it gets?
YAWN!!!! OMG could your question be any longer! Boring!!!!
This is all a cover for theft by the Dumbya Coup and their predecessors.
How much did Clinton pay you for that ramble?